Page 47 - ESJ – ENERGY STORAGE JOURNAL
P. 47

FEATURE: RECYCLING




          “It’s a bit opaque exactly what is going on,
        and it’s not clear whether they are getting it to  Right now you’ve got cobalt driving the recycling
        work efficiently enough so that the value out   process in the plants where it is happening, because
        of the back end is high enough that you will
        be able to eliminate the necessary tipping fee,”  it’s profitable. – Linda Gaines
        he says. “There is a lot of cathode-to-cathode
        recycling out there, it may have been done at
        a lab scale, at some pilot scale, but we’re still
        in the early stages of figuring out which is the
        most effective.
          “I believe most of the recycling going on is
        the consumer batteries, and I sense that’s what
        Brunp and so on is doing. No one really has
        auto batteries yet in such quantities that they
        know what to do with them.
          “But the clock is ticking. We’re so early in
        the EV age that we don’t know what the true
        life cycle is going to be — it varies tremen-
        dously, depending on how often they’ve been
        used and cycled, and where. So there’s a whole
        bunch of variables to which there will be a
        mathematical answer in time — but in the   RSR Technologies is also working with the
        meantime, the clock is ticking.”        ReCell Center. President  Tim Ellis says the
          Realizing this, the US DoE has offered a   company has been researching the recycling of
        $5.5million  ‘Battery Recycling Prize’ to in-  lithium batteries for 10 years.
        centivize businesses to develop a process that   “We have a lot of technology that allows us
        can profitably capture 90% of all discarded or   to reclaim the elements, we just can’t figure
        spent lithium batteries in the US.      out the economics of it,” he says. “It’s part of
          It has also donated $15 million over three   our normal technical development; we are the
        years to the  Argonne National Laboratory,   largest recycler of lead batteries in the west-
        which is working with a consortium of com-  ern world but we don’t see ourselves as a lead
        panies and research institutes – including Oak   company, we’re an electrochemical cell recy-
        Ridge National Laboratory, Worchester Poly-  cling company. We’re in lead because it’s the
        technic Institute and the University of Califor-  biggest volume. But we believe all the chem-
        nia — to set up a ReCell Center to develop a   istries  will  show  up  and  one  thing  it  seems
        pre-commercial prototype for the industry to   the world agrees on is that digging mines and
        take and scale up by the end of that period.   holes in the ground to make batteries and then
          Linda Gaines is systems analyst at the ANL,   throw them in a landfill is a bad thing.
        and chief scientist with the ReCell Center.   “The DoE is very honest because it’s not
        One of her principal research tasks is looking   wedded to anyone’s business plan. There is a
        at extricating the cathode structure in its en-  lot of hype in recycling batteries but some of
        tirety rather than separating its constituents –   these guys are just interested in flipping a ven-
        a technology that is being tried elsewhere but   ture start-up, they’re not interested in build-
        has yet to achieve results that prove it could   ing a business. And there’s a lot of interest in
        be profitable.                          second use because it’s not obvious that mate-
          “None of the materials in the battery makes   rial reclamation from the lithium battery is an
        up the lion’s share of the mass and you have to   obvious path like it is for lead.
        separate them from each other, which isn’t so
        easy because there isn’t one that’s a lot heav-  2,500,000
        ier than everything else,” she says. “And right
        now you’ve got cobalt driving the recycling
        process in the plants  where  it is  happening,   1,875,000
        because it’s profitable.
          “But one of the areas the DoE is concentrat-
        ing on is how to make batteries with less and   1,250,000
        even no cobalt   — which is good in that we
        wouldn’t  be  dependent  on  importing  it,  but
        bad because it means at the end-of-life there’s
        less to recover, reducing the materials of value   625,000
        to get out of the process.
          “This is what makes the structure of the
        cathode a valuable commodity to recover.        2010 2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025
        Even if you have less valuable elements, if you
        put them into a structure that’s valuable and       Placed on the market  End-of-life    Available for recycling
        can recover that structure, you have the pos-
        sibility of having an economical process.”   EV batteries POM, EOL, recycling (tonnes global)   Source: Global Battery Alliance


        www.energystoragejournal.com                                               Energy Storage Journal • Summer 2019 • 45
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52